State-dependent memory refers to when a person’s ability to recall information is influenced by their particular mental or physical state state at the time of encoding the memory. If the internal state during recall matches the state during encoding, retrieval of the memory is typically more successful. This cognitive psychology concept highlights the tight interplay between memory and a person’s internal state, whether emotional, physiological, or pharmacological.
Internal states, such as emotions, body physiology, and even levels of certain substances in the body, can significantly dictate the encoding process of memories. When an individual learns information while in a particular state, such as feeling joyful or under the influence of caffeine, these internal states can become encoded along with the information.
Context Dependent Memory vs State-Dependent Memory
Context dependent memory refers to the phenomenon where individuals are able to recall information more effectively if they are in the same environment, or context, in which they first learned the material. This type of memory suggests that the external environment acts as a cue that triggers recollection. For example, studying in the same classroom where a test takes place can often result in better recall during the exam.
On the other hand, state dependent memory is related to the internal states of the individual during the encoding and retrieval process. If a person learns information while in a certain mood, level of alertness, or even under the influence of a particular substance, they are more likely to recall the information when they are in the same state. For instance, caffeine-induced alertness during learning can affect memory retrieval when the individual is similarly alert.
While both types rely on specific conditions for optimal memory recall, context dependent memory is associated with external cues whereas state dependent memory is tied to internal cues. Both concepts emphasize that memory performance is not only about the stored information itself but also the conditions under which it is encoded and retrieved.
Biological Mechanisms
At its most fundamental level, state-dependent memory is the result of the enhancement of a specific synaptic pathway within the brain. A neural synapse refers to the gap between brain cells, known as neurons, which facilitates the transmission of chemical signals from one neuron to another.
Neurotransmitters, which are chemicals, exit one cell, traverse the synapse, and are absorbed by the subsequent neuron through a neurotransmitter receptor. This establishes a link between the two neurons known as a neural pathway. Memory is dependent on the reinforcement of these neural pathways, connecting one neuron to another.
When we learn anything, new connections are formed between neurons in the brain, which subsequently communicate via chemical signals. If these cells have a history of delivering certain signals under specific chemical conditions within the brain, they are primed to perform best under similar situations.
State-dependent memory occurs when a new neural connection is formed while the brain is in a certain chemical state. While there is compelling evidence for the existence of state-dependent memory, it is unclear what the benefit of this may be.
In 2006, Lorena Pomplio, a zoology researcher, and her team addressed this question while exploring the existence of state-dependent memory in invertebrates, specifically grasshoppers. Until this point, only vertebrates had been utilized for the examination of state-dependent memory.
This investigation’s results show that invertebrates also experienced the phenomenon, especially in relation to conditions of low or high nutritional intake. The conclusion drawn by Pomplio and her associates (2006) was that their findings demonstrated a potential “adaptive advantage” of state-dependent learning, which accounts for its intrinsic presence in a wide range of species.
State-dependent memory recollects a time when the organism was in a similar condition, thereby influencing the decisions they make in the present. In the case of these grasshoppers, their low nutritional state triggered cognitive associations with similar states of hardship and prepared the insects to make decisions they had made when confronted with low nutrition in previous circumstances. The paper proposed that this phenomenon enables swift decision-making when an organism lacks the time or neural capacity to thoroughly process every option.
Brain Regions Involved
Several key brain regions are involved in state-dependent memory. The hippocampus is critical for forming new episodic memories and is sensitive to changes in the emotional or physiological state of an individual.
The prefrontal cortex plays a role in the strategic aspects of memory retrieval, which can be influenced by the internal state. In addition, the amygdala is heavily involved in processing emotions, which can affect the strength and retrievability of memories formed in conjunction with emotional states.
Influence of Mood and Emotion
The influence of mood on memory, which varies depending on the state of the individual, has sparked controversy in the field of psychology. Initially, the research seemed to support the existence of mood-dependent memory, but later, doubts arose when researchers proposed that the findings were actually a result of mood congruent memory. This phenomenon occurs when a person recalls more information related to their current state, such as illness.
For instance, if someone with a cold is asked to memorize a list of words, they may later remember more words associated with their condition, like “tissue” or “congestion.” In an effort to uncover the truth about mood-dependent memory, researchers have conducted experiments. However, it remains challenging to completely eliminate the possibility of unreliability in such studies.
Some investigations have explored the presence of mood-dependent memory, particularly in individuals who have bipolar disorder and typically alternate between extreme moods over time, specifically depression and mania. In 1977, it was shown that individuals with bipolar disorder performed better on a test that involved associating words when they were in a similar mood state to the one they were in when they initially learned the word associations.
A more recent study conducted in 2011 also examined a group of individuals with bipolar disorder and found evidence supporting mood-dependent memory on a visual task involving the recognition of inkblots. It was noted that participants had better recall for these inkblots when they were in the same mood state as when they first saw them. However, researchers did not observe a similar effect for verbal tasks.
Since the two studies have differing findings regarding the impact of mood on verbal recall tasks, further research is necessary to clarify the existence of mood-dependent memory for both verbal and visual recall tasks. Additionally, it is important to investigate mood-dependent memory in individuals with other mood disorders, as well as those without any mood disorders at all.
In 1979, a study was undertaken on an individual named Jonah who suffered from Multiple Personality Disorder. When Jonah was posed with a variety of questions covering different topics, it was not until he was presented with personal and emotional inquiries that his distinct alter egos seemed to manifest. Each “personality” appeared to be entirely separate from the others.
Upon completion of the study, Jonah was inquired about his recollections from the previous day. He could only recall the questions that were posed to him prior to the emergence of his alternative personalities, specifically before he was asked emotionally charged questions.
While multiple personality disorder is an intricate subject that extends beyond state-dependent memory, there is a possibility that the varying levels of memory experienced by each personality could be related to mood-dependent memory.
Effects of Substances
Alcohol consumption can lead to state-dependent effects on memory, creating a scenario where information learned while under the influence of alcohol is more readily recalled when in the same state. This dichotomy can significantly impact one’s ability to retrieve memories when sober versus when intoxicated.
Alcoholism may strengthen state-dependent memory as well. In a study comparing the state-dependent memory effects of alcohol on participants with and without alcoholism, researchers discovered that alcoholic subjects had stronger impacts on state-dependent memory tasks such as recall and free association. This is not because alcohol makes more associations, but because the individual with alcoholism spends a greater proportion of their time under the effect of alcohol.
Evidence for marijuana’s effects on an individual’s cognitive ability to recall information have been mixed, independent of the state in which they were encoding or recalling. In one study, a large number of participants with varied amounts of THC exposure were given a dose of this drug and instructed to perform memory-related tasks. The final results did not provide enough evidence to support a solid claim on cannabis and state-dependent memory.
Learning and Education
State-dependent learning implies that students are more likely to recall information if their physical or mental state is similar to when they learned the information. For instance, if a student learns material while feeling upbeat, they may retrieve it more successfully when in a similar mood. Research provides evidence that cues encountered during the learning process become less effective if the retrieval state differs substantially from the learning state.
The application of this concept indicates that students might benefit from consistent learning environments. This consistency can help in anchoring the material to specific contextual cues, contributing to improved recall during assessments or real-world applications.
Educators can implement several effective strategies to exploit the advantages of state-dependent memory. Creating a consistent learning environment is one, but they can also teach students how to self-induce learning states that are conducive to recall. Encouraging the use of mnemonic devices links course material with unique cues that can trigger memory recall.
Additionally, integrating learning with emotions or physical sensations, such as using gestures or expressive facial expressions when teaching, can lead to stronger memory traces. (This is more in the realm of context-dependent memory, however) By acknowledging the effects of different states on memory, teachers can develop a diverse set of strategies to support student learning and knowledge retention.
Clinical Implications
When patients struggle with trauma, therapists may use state-dependent learning as a tool to help them access and process painful memories. Memories tied to traumatic events, such as those experienced by individuals with PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), are often more accessible when the person is in a similar state to the one they were in during the event.
Guided sessions that gently induce a comparable emotional or physiological state can aid in bringing these flashbacks to the fore, enabling a constructive confrontation with the trauma in a safe therapeutic environment. This approach supports patients in processing their experiences and reducing the grip of depression and trauma on their lives.
Evidence of state-dependent learning has been discovered in hyperactive children taking the drug methylphenidate, also known as Ritalin or Concerta, which is commonly recommended to treat ADHD symptoms. Children with hyperactivity who took this medication during periods of learning retained that information better during future periods of methylphenidate usage, demonstrating methylphenidate’s usefulness in assisting learning in children diagnosed with hyperactive disorders.
Theories and Models
Donald Thomson and Endel Tulving’s notion of encoding specificity posits that memory recall is most efficient when the context at retrieval matches the context during the encoding of the information. He suggests that cues present during the storage of memories become intricately linked with the memory itself, helping to trigger recall when the same cues are present again.
Phillip Higham has criticized the design and interpretation of Thomson and Tulving’s initial research, which used strong and weak cues to generate the encoding specificity principle. He claims that the use of forced-report retrieval may have resulted in participants responding positively to the cues, not because they were encoded during the learning process, but because of pre-experimental associations.
Suggesting that the word on the list ‘came to mind’ during the experiment and that anyone may have given a positive response. Strong cues increase the likelihood of this happening. This is called the ‘lucky guessing’ criticism.
Donald Overton proposed a model explaining that the physiological or psychological state of an individual can affect memory recall. His model, referred to as state-dependent learning, indicates that substances or altered states can tie memories to the particular state experienced during encoding, necessitating the recreation of that state for optimal retrieval.
In 1964, Overton conducted a study that aimed to examine the impact of sodium pentobarbital on the ability of rats to learn and remember certain taught responses. These rats were randomly divided into two groups – one group received the substance while the other group did not (the control condition).
They were then placed in a simple maze and taught to escape an electrical shock. Overton discovered that the rats that had received 25 mg of sodium pentobarbital were unable to recall the proper escape response when they were later placed in the maze without the drug.
However, if these rats were given sodium pentobarbital again and placed in the maze, they were able to remember the escape response they had been taught. Similarly, when Overton taught a rat the escape response under the control condition (without administering sodium pentobarbital), it could not remember that behavior when it was given the drug and asked to perform later on.
The results strongly suggested that rats performed the learned response more effectively when they were in the same state (either with sodium pentobarbital or in the control condition) as when they initially learned it. The study specifically stated that “a response learned under the influence of a particular drug will subsequently reoccur (with maximum strength) only when that drug condition is reinstated.”
References:
- Byrne, J.H., Kandel, E.R. (1996). Presynaptic facilitation revisited: state and time dependence, Journal of Neuroscience, 16(2), 425–435
- Eich, Eric. (1980) The cue-dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval. Mem Cogn 8, 157–173
- Eich, Eric, (1995) Searching for Mood Dependent Memory. Psychological Science ,6(2), 67–75
- Higham, Philip A. (January 2002). Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited. Memory & Cognition. 30 (1): 67–80. doi:10.3758/bf03195266
- Miles, C., & Hardman, E. (1998). State-dependent memory produced by aerobic exercise. Ergonomics, 41(1), 20–28
- Mystkowski, J.L., Mineka, S., Vernon, L.L., Zinbarg, R.E., (2003) Changes in Caffeine States Enhance Return of Fear in Spider Phobia, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 243–250
- Nutt, R.M., Lam, D. (2011) Comparison of mood-dependent memory in bipolar disorder and normal controls, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 379–386 doi: 10.1002/cpp.778
- Overton, D. A. (1964). Statedependent or” dissociated” learning produced with pentobarbital. Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 57(1), 3
- Pompilio, L., Kacelnik, A., Behmer, S.T., (2006) State-dependent learning valuation drives choice in an invertebrate. Science, 311(5756), 1613–1615 https://users.ox.ac.uk/~kgroup/publications/pdf/pompilio_2006_science.pdf
- Roediger, Henry (2014). Variates of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving. New York: Psychology Press ISBN 978-0-898-59935-0
- Schoeler, Tabea; Bhattacharyya, Sagnik (2013-01-23). The effect of cannabis use on memory function: an update. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation. 4: 11–27. doi:10.2147/SAR.S25869
- Sutker, Patricia B.; Adams, Henry E., eds. (2001). Comprehensive Handbook of Psychopathology. doi: 10.1007/b107807
- Swanson, J M, and M Kinsbourne (1976) Stimulant-related state-dependent learning in hyperactive children. Science (New York, N.Y.) vol. 192,4246 (1976): 1354-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1273596
- Tulving, Endel; Thomson, Donald M. (1971). Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 87 (1): 116–124. doi:10.1037/h0030186
- Weingartner, H, and L A Faillace. (1971) Alcohol state-dependent learning in man. The Journal of nervous and mental disease vol. 153,6 395-406. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197112000-00003
- Weingartner, H., Miller, H., Murphy, D.L. (1977) Mood-dependent retrieval of verbal associations, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(3), 276–284
- Zarrindast, Mohammad-Reza; Kangarlu-Haghighi, Katayoun; Khalilzadeh, Azita, Fazli-Tabaei, Soheila (2006) Influence of intracerebroventricular administration of cannabinergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory in the step-down passive avoidance test. Behavioural Pharmacology 17 (3):p 231-237