Self-regulation refers to the ability to manage one’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors to reach a desired goal. Psychologists such as Albert Bandura and Roy Baumeister have contributed significantly to our understanding of this construct.
Self-regulation involves multiple stages. Throughout the stages, individuals must contribute to their own motivation, conduct, and growth within a network of reciprocally interacting factors.
Self-regulation is a cornerstone of good mental health. It enables individuals to manage stress, resist impulsive behaviors, and navigate complex social interactions. For instance, those who have highly developed self-regulation skills are better equipped to handle anxiety and depression. They can use strategies of emotion regulation to maintain emotional balance and adapt to life’s challenges effectively.
Self-regulation Theory
Self-regulation theory (SRT) refers to a conscious, personal management system that entails guiding one’s own thoughts, behaviours, and emotions to achieve goals.
Roy Baumeister, one of the leading social psychologists who has studied self-regulation, claims that it consists of four components: standards of desirable behavior, motivation to meet standards, monitoring of situations and thoughts that precede breaking said standards, and willpower.
Baumeister and other colleagues created three models of self-regulation to describe its cognitive accessibility: self-regulation as a knowledge structure, strength, or skill. According to research, the strength model is widely supported because it is a limited resource in the brain and only a certain degree of self-regulation can occur before that resource is depleted.
Self-regulation theory can be used to address the cognitive bias known as the illusion of control. People who are motivated by internal goals that involve exerting control over their surroundings may want to reestablish control in the face of chaos, uncertainty, or stress. In the absence of true control, one coping technique will be to rely on protective attributions of control, resulting in illusions of control.
It is also relevant to impulse control, the management of short-term desires. People with limited impulse control are more likely to act on their immediate urges.
Many criminal activities are committed in the heat of the moment, therefore this is one way for such persons to end up in jail. Nonviolent persons may lose friends due to reckless outbursts, or they may face financial difficulties as a result of making too many impulsive purchases.
Self-regulation Examples
An individual might use self-regulated learning techniques to prepare for a test, setting specific study goals and monitoring progress. Self-control can also be observed when someone resists the urge to respond angrily in a heated discussion, choosing instead to reply calmly.
Self-regulated learning is an act of controlling and assessing one’s own learning and behavior. This emphasizes individual control over behaviors aimed at informational goals. For example, someone taking a distance learning or online course needs to pace themselves and ensure they do the minimum daily required study work.
Research shows that students with proficient self-regulation skills tend to perform better academically. They can set learning goals, manage their time efficiently, and use effective study strategies. Especially for complex or challenging subjects, self-regulation helps them persevere, maintain focus, and seek help when necessary, ultimately leading to educational attainment.
In personal development, self-regulation is vital in setting and achieving goals. It’s through self-regulatory behavior that adults can cultivate the motivation and discipline needed to improve themselves. This can range from advancing career skills to adopting healthier lifestyles. With strong self-regulation, they can plan, monitor, and reflect on their progress, making adjustments along the way to stay aligned with their aspirations.
Effective communication hinges on self-regulation in relationships. Individuals must be capable of expressing thoughts and feelings clearly without invoking unnecessary anger or frustration. For instance, utilizing “I” statements helps to take ownership of one’s emotions and reduce blame.
Every relationship has implicit or explicit behavioral expectations. Self-regulation ensures that individuals act in ways that are consistent with these norms, such as showing respect, practicing fairness, and maintaining boundaries.
Self-Regulation Strategies
Goal-setting is one of the most effective regulating skills. To set effective goals, one must make sure they are clear, measurable, and achievable.
Planning involves outlining the actions that will lead to achieving these goals. Tools such as action plans and to-do lists can streamline this process. For example, a person might establish a study schedule to improve academic performance.
Monitoring and Reflection
Monitoring entails tracking progress toward goals, which helps in recognizing achievements and identifying areas for improvement. Keeping a journal or log can facilitate this awareness.
Reflection involves looking back at the actions taken and outcomes achieved, to understand what worked and what didn’t. This introspective approach enhances one’s ability to adjust strategies moving forward.
Adaptive Coping Skills
Developing adaptive coping skills is crucial for managing stress and setbacks. This could include relaxation techniques, problem-solving methods, and seeking social support. Building resilience allows one to maintain focus on goals despite obstacles.
Research indicates that those who employ adaptive coping mechanisms are better at sustaining self-regulation efforts.
Behavioral Self-Regulation vs Emotional Self-Regulation
When discussing self-regulation, it’s important to distinguish between emotional self-regulation, which involves managing one’s emotional responses, and behavioral self-regulation, which encompasses the actions taken towards goal achievement.
Behavioral self-regulation refers to the ability to manage one’s actions and maintain control over behavior in response to external demands and conditions. It involves processes that guide goal-directed behavior, such as planning, response inhibition, and the ability to delay gratification. The goal is to achieve task-oriented outcomes.
Emotional self-regulation, on the other hand, involves the ability to manage and respond to an emotional experience. It includes strategies to control intense emotions, such as anger or frustration, and the capacity to soothe oneself or to seek out others for comfort and support. The goal is to achieve emotional stability.
The foundation of emotional self-regulation lies in understanding emotional responses. This involves recognizing the various emotions that an individual can experience and acknowledging the triggers that elicit these emotions.
For instance, anger could be a reaction to perceived unfairness while anxiety may result from uncertainty about the future. Identifying the source of emotions is the first step in learning how to manage them effectively.
Self-Regulation Challenges and Disorders
Self-regulation is vital for managing emotions and behaviors, but certain psychological conditions can disrupt this process, leading to challenges in everyday life.
Individuals with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) often experience difficulty in self-regulating attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. This can lead to feelings of frustration and anxiety. Similarly, those on the autism spectrum may find self-regulation especially challenging due to difficulties in understanding social cues and managing sensory information.
Addiction and Substance Use
Addiction and substance use disorders heavily impact self-regulation. These conditions are characterized by an intense focus on obtaining and using substances, often at the expense of other activities and obligations. It involves a cycle of guilt and repeated attempts to regain control over one’s behaviors, which are commonly undermined by cravings and withdrawal symptoms.
Eating Disorders
Eating disorders, such as anorexia, bulimia, and binge-eating disorder, exhibit a complex relationship with self-regulation. Those affected may oscillate between extreme control over food intake and periods of loss of control. These disorders are often associated with profound feelings of guilt and anxiety, which can further complicate individuals’ abilities to self-regulate effectively.
Research and Perspectives
Many studies have been conducted to test various aspects of self-regulation. Albert Bandura investigated self-regulation before, after, and during the response.
He developed the reciprocal determinism triangle, which encompasses behavior, environment, and the individual (cognitive, emotional, and physical variables), all of which influence one another. Bandura concluded that self-observation, self-reaction, self-evaluation, and self-efficacy interact in equal measure to drive goal attainment and motivation.
Ego Depletion
Social psychologist Roy Baumeister described the ability to self-regulate as having a limited capacity, and developed the concept of ego depletion. Ego depletion is the contentious idea that self-control or willpower draws on a limited pool of mental resources that can be used up. Being in a state of ego depletion would then hinder one’s ability to control themselves later on.
Baumeister, along with Nathan Dewall, Matthew Gailliot and Jon Maner performed a series of experiments instructing participants to perform ego depletion tasks to diminish the self-regulatory resource in the brain, that they theorized to be glucose. This included tasks that required participants to break a familiar habit, where they read an essay and circled words containing the letter ‘e’ for the first task, then were asked to break that habit by performing a second task where they circled words containing ‘e’ and/or ‘a’.
Following the study, participants were randomly assigned to either the glucose group, which drank a glass of lemonade produced with sugar, or the control group, which drank lemonade made with Splenda. They were then questioned about their individual likelihoods of assisting specific people in hypothetical situations, both kin and non-kin.
They found that excluding kin, people were much less likely to help a person in need if they were in the control group (with Splenda) than if they had replenished their brain glucose supply with the lemonade containing real sugar. This study also lends support to the model of self-regulation as a strength, confirming that it is a limited resource.
Self-regulation Models
In 1998, the psychologists Mark Muraven, Dianne Tice, and Roy Baumeister did research on self-control as a limited resource. They proposed three competing theories for self-regulation: as a strength, a knowledge structure, and a skill.
In the strength model, they suggested that self-regulation may be regarded a strength because it demands willpower, which is a finite resource. Failure to self-regulate could be explained by the depletion of this resource.
They hypothesized that self-regulation as a knowledge structure requires a specific level of knowledge to exert self control, and that failure to self-regulate, like any taught method, might be explained by a lack of knowledge.
Finally, the concept regarding self-regulation as a skill stated that self-regulation is developed over time and cannot be lessened; hence, failure to exert would be attributed to a lack of talent. They found that self-regulation as a strength is the most practicable model, based on research that suggests self-regulation is a finite resource.
Criticisms
Baumeister’s strength model of ego depletion has been questioned in several ways. Meta-analyses revealed minimal support for the strength model of self-regulation and glucose as a finite resource that is depleted.
A pre-registered trial found no evidence for ego depletion. Several commentators have criticized this particular study.
In conclusion, many basic assumptions of the strength model of self-regulation appear to be in need of revision, particularly the view of self-regulation as a limited resource that may be depleted and glucose as the depleted fuel, which appears to be difficult to defend without significant revisions.
References:
- Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248-287.
- Baumeister, Roy F. (2002). Ego Depletion and Self-Control Failure: An Energy Model of the Self’s Executive Function. Self and Identity. 1 (2): 129–136. doi: 10.1080/152988602317319302
- Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 2nd ed. The Guilford Press
- Cazan, A. M. (2013). Teaching self regulated learning strategies for psychology students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 743-747
- DeWall, Nathan; Baumeister, Roy; Gailliot, Matthew; Maner, Jon (2008). Depletion Makes the Heart Grow Less Helpful: Helping as a Function of Self-Regulatory Energy and Genetic Relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 34 (12): 1653–62. doi:10.1177/0146167208323981
- Edossa, A. K., Schroeders, U., Weinert, S., & Artelt, C. (2018). The development of emotional and behavioral self-regulation and their effects on academic achievement in childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(2), 192-202
- Fenton‐O’Creevy, M., Nicholson, N., Soane, E., & Willman, P. (2003). Trading on illusions: Unrealistic perceptions of control and trading performance. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 76(1), 53-68
- McClelland, M. M., & Cameron, C. E. (2011). Self‐regulation and academic achievement in elementary school children. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2011(133), 29-44.
- Muraven, Mark; Tice, Dianne; Baumeister, Roy (1998). Self-Control as Limited Resource: Regulatory Depletion Patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74 (3): 774–89. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.774
- Muraven, M.; Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?. Psychological Bulletin. 126 (2): 247–59. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247
- Vadillo, M. A., Gold, N. & Osman, M. The Bitter Truth About Sugar and Willpower: The Limited Evidential Value of the Glucose Model of Ego Depletion. Psychol. Sci. 2016; 0956797616654911 doi: 10.1177/0956797616654911
- Zeidner, M. (1995). Adaptive coping with test situations: A review of the literature. Educational psychologist, 30(3), 123-133