Salience is the trait that makes something stand out. Salient events are an attentional strategy that organisms use to learn and survive; these organisms can focus their limited perceptual and cognitive resources on the relevant (that is, salient) subset of sensory data at their disposal.
This term is commonly utilized in the study of perception and cognition in psychology to describe any feature of a stimulus that, for any number of reasons, stands out from the rest. Salience is not always related to physical traits like intensity, clarity, or size and can be the result of emotional, motivational, or cognitive factors.
Salience bias is a cognitive bias that occurs when individuals focus on items or information that are more prominent and ignore those that are less noticeable. Prominence can be visual, emotional, or memory-driven. This bias leads to giving undue weight to these salient features, often at the cost of a comprehensive evaluation.
Causes of Salience Bias
Salience bias is understood as a product of innate perceptual processes that prioritize new or conspicuous information. It’s rooted in the psychological principle that the human brain is wired to respond to immediate and striking stimuli, which historically were essential for survival. However, in contemporary settings, this natural inclination can skew rational decision-making.
This bias is related to the availability heuristic, a mental shortcut that relies on immediate examples that come to a person’s mind when evaluating a specific topic, concept, event, or decision. The availability of such information often leads to errors.
Another related bias is the actor-observer bias – the tendency to attribute one’s own actions to external factors while attributing others’ actions to their character or disposition. When coupled with salience bias, individuals might more readily notice and weight salient traits or actions in others, while overlooking such factors in their own behavior. This can lead to skewed judgments where the influence of situational factors is understated for others but overstated for oneself, reinforcing biased perceptions of behavior.
Perceptual Influences
Attention is naturally drawn to what is prominent and emotionally striking in the environment. People tend to focus on elements that stand out due to contrast or intensity.
For instance, a brightly colored object against a dull background is likely to be noticed faster and remembered more vividly. Elements that disrupt the norm or that are visually or auditorily striking are key players in fostering salience bias.
Examples:
- Visually striking details
- Bright colors
- Size
- Movement
- Cognitive and Emotional Factors
On the cognitive side, ease of processing — or cognitive ease — makes certain pieces of information more salient. Items that are easily and quickly understood, often because of familiarity or simplicity, are more likely to be influential. The repetitive exposure to a stimulus can also create a sense of familiarity, which then increases its salience.
Emotions and beliefs further accentuate salience bias. Emotional content tends to receive more attention and memory recall. Strong beliefs, on the other hand, can cause an individual to prioritize information that aligns with those beliefs, leading to a distorted view of what is salient.
Emotional influences:
- Personal relevance
- Fear
- Humor
Cognitive influences:
- Familiarity
- Simplicity
- Repetition
Impact on Decision-Making
Consumers frequently make purchasing decisions that are influenced by the prominence of certain product attributes. Items with features that are more salient or noticeable, whether due to marketing or packaging, tend to be chosen over others, even if they are not necessarily of higher quality or value.
Studies exploring the salience bias in crowdsourcing contests underscore how salience can affect choices by enhancing certain information in the decision process.
Investors may be drawn to stocks that have recently performed well or are in the news, disregarding the potential for long-term value in less conspicuous options. This bias towards noticeable outcomes can overshadow statistical data, leading to investment decisions that are not grounded in thorough analysis.
A study investigating whether salience matters in investment decisions highlights the variance between the decision-making of individual and professional investors with regard to how salient information is perceived and acted upon. The impact was almost 1.5 times higher for long-term investment decision compared to short-term decision.
Salience in Everyday Life
Salience bias features in our day-to-day lives. It can lead consumers to focus primarily on attention-grabbing headlines and stories.
This effect often hinges on contrast; high-impact images and sensational topics become more significant in the viewers’ perception, possibly at the expense of less dramatic, though equally important, news. For instance, colorful infographics or poignant photographs accompanying an article may drive the reader’s attention and subsequently shape their understanding and memory of the event.
In the urban environment and city life, salience bias is evident in how residents and visitors navigate and experience the city. Prominent landmarks, brightly lit signage, and bustling marketplaces draw attention, providing real-time feedback and cues for behavior.
These high-salience features of cityscapes can guide one’s movement and choices, sometimes overshadowing other elements like quieter, less conspicuous streets or architectural details. When walking through a city, the towering skyscrapers or the clamor of construction can become the focus of one’s experience, due to their immediate sensory impact.
Salience in Behavioral Science
Cognitive biases, such as salience bias, profoundly impact behavior. They represent systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment.
These biases arise from the tendency of individuals to prioritize salient information — information that stands out, is novel, or seems particularly relevant to us — over less noticeable data. Within behavioral science, the understanding of heuristics informs the approach to salience.
Humans have bounded rationality, which refers to their restricted ability to be reasonable in decision making due to a limited capacity to comprehend information and cognitive abilities. Heuristics such as the anchoring effect are used to lessen the complexity of cognitive and social activities or judgments in order to reduce the cognitive burden caused by restricted rationality.
Behavioral economics integrates insights from psychology with economic theory to explain why individuals might not always act in their best economic interest. One explanation behavioral economics offers for apparently irrational economic behavior is the influence of salience on decision-making. It demonstrates that visually striking or emotionally impacting information can disproportionately affect an individual’s economic choices.
Research within this field has shown that making the consequences of one’s actions more salient can significantly alter consumption behavior, often leading to increased efficiency and savings. For example, real-time feedback on electricity usage can reduce energy consumption significantly, underscoring the powerful role salience plays in conservation efforts.
Furthermore, visual salience can influence social behaviors and interactions. Changes in an individual’s perceptual salience have a significant impact on their social conduct and subjective experience of their social interactions, validating the “social salience effect.” Social salience refers to how people perceive and respond to others.
References:
- Chaudary, S. (2019), Does salience matter in investment decision? Differences between individual and professional investors. Kybernetes, Vol. 48 No. 8, pp. 1894-1912
- Inderbitzin, Martin P.; Betella, Alberto; Lanatá, Antonio; Scilingo, Enzo P.; Bernardet, Ulysses; Verschure, Paul F. M. J. (February 2013). The social perceptual salience effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 39 (1): 62–74. doi:10.1037/a0028317
- Lee, H. C. B., Ba, S., Li, X., & Stallaert, J. (2018). Salience bias in crowdsourcing contests. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 401-418
- Schneider W, Shiffrin RM (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review. 84 (1): 1–66. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1
- Taylor, Shelley E. (1982), Tversky, Amos; Kahneman, Daniel; Slovic, Paul (eds.), The availability bias in social perception and interaction, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-28414-1
- Tversky, Amos; Kahneman, Daniel (1974-09-27). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science. 185 (4157): 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
- Zhaoping L (2014). Understanding vision: theory, models, and data. UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199564668