So-called “helicopter parenting” probably isn’t so great for human children, but some of that clinginess and overprotection may actually almost be healthy for rearing dogs and cats.
An online survey of more than 1,000 pet owners nationwide analyzed the key personality traits and nurturing styles of people who identified as a “cat person,” a “dog person,” “both,” or “neither.”
People who expressed the greatest affection for their pets also rated among the most conscientious and neurotic. This finding suggests that the qualities that make for overbearing parents might work better for our domesticated canine and feline companions, who tend to require lifelong parenting.
Affection and Dependence
Said study coauthor Mikel Delgado, University of California, Berkeley doctoral student in psychology:
“The fact that higher levels of neuroticism are associated with affection and anxious attachment suggests that people who score higher on that dimension may have high levels of affection and dependence on their pets, which may be a good thing for pets.”
The results echo those of a 2010 study by University of Texas psychologist Sam Gosling, which showed dog owners to be more extroverted, but less open to new experiences, and cat owners to be more neurotic, but also more creative and adventurous.
While previous studies have focused on people’s attachment to their pets, this is the first US study to incorporate the principles of human attachment theory — which assesses the bond between parents and children or between romantic partners — with pet owners’ personality types, including whether they identify as a “dog person” or “cat person.”
Dogs, Cats or Neither
It is also the first to find a positive correlation between neuroticism, anxious attachment, and the care of and affection for pets, says coauthor Gretchen Reevy, a psychologist at California State University, East Bay.
Delgado and Reevy recruited male and female pet owners of all ages on Craigslist, their personal Facebook pages, and pet-related pages on the Reddit news and social networking site.
Nearly 40 percent of those surveyed said they liked dogs and cats equally, while 38 percent identified as dog people and 19 percent as cat people. A mere 3 percent favored neither.
The online questionnaire was based on both human and animal attachment assessments, including one that measures the “Big Five” overarching human characteristics (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism).
Pet owners were also rated according to the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale, which measures affection for pets, and the Pet Attachment Questionnaire, which gauges “anxious attachment” and “avoidant attachment.”
People who score high on anxious attachment tend to need more reassurance from the objects of their affection, and in the survey, those tended to be younger people who chose a cat as a favorite pet.
Anxious Attachment
Conversely, people who rate highly on avoidant attachment, which refers to a less affectionate and more withdrawn temperament and can inspire such rejoinders as “commitment-phobe” in romantic relationships, are much less needy.
Both dog and cat lovers scored low on avoidant attachment, suggesting both personality types enjoy close relationships with their pets.
“We hypothesized that more attentive and affectionate pet owners would receive higher affection scores and lower avoidant attachment scores, as higher levels of avoidant attachment would suggest distancing behaviors between the individual and their pet,”
Delgado says.
Delgado and Reevy plan to dig deeper into the link between neuroticism and affection for and dependence on one’s pet.
“We will investigate further whether greater affection for and greater anxious attachment to one’s pet, and neuroticism, are associated with better care and understanding of the pet’s needs,” Reevy says.
Reference:
- Gretchen M. Reevy & Mikel M. Delgadob. Are Emotionally Attached Companion Animal Caregivers Conscientious and Neurotic? Factors That Affect the Human–Companion Animal Relationship. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 17 Dec 2014, DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2014.988333
Last Updated on October 27, 2023