Egotism often manifests as an inflated sense of self-importance and is closely aligned with narcissism. It’s marked by an excessive fixation on one’s own abilities, achievements, and needs. This self-centered attitude can lead to a disregard for others’ feelings or circumstances. The egotistical person primarily sees the world through the lens of personal gain, and their opinions are heavily swayed by self-interest.
On the other hand, egocentrism involves a cognitive bias that prevents individuals from fully understanding or acknowledging others’ perspectives or emotions. This is not necessarily out of a conscious desire to prioritize oneself over others; rather, it’s a limitation in one’s awareness or cognitive development. It’s a natural phase in early childhood development but can persist into adulthood in varying degrees.
The differences between these two concepts are subtle yet significant:
- Egotistic: Characterized by self-centeredness to the point of ignoring others’ needs.
- Egocentric: A reduced ability to step outside one’s own viewpoint, but not necessarily with self-interest as a motivator.
In both cases, one’s worldview is skewed to prioritize the self, but the nuances and underlying motivations differ. For egotistical individuals, the world revolves around their desires and achievements, while for egocentric individuals, it is an unintentional limited perspective.
Character Traits and Behaviors
Egotism is strongly related to a self-centered love for one’s imagined self, also known as narcissism. Egotists have a great desire to talk about themselves in a self-promoting manner, and they may be arrogant and boastful, with a disproportionate sense of their own significance.
Their failure to appreciate the successes of others makes them passionately self-promoting, but sensitivity to criticism can lead to narcissistic rage over any perceived insult. There is often a lack of empathy: egotistic people may find it difficult to relate to the emotions and situations of others because their own experiences take precedence.
Traits of Egocentrism
Limited Perspective: Egocentric individuals may have trouble seeing things from perspectives other than their own. They might not be intentionally self-absorbed; rather, they struggle to recognize that other viewpoints exist.
Conceited but Unintentionally So: While they can seem conceited, egocentric individuals are often unaware of the self-centered nature of their thoughts and actions, unlike the more deliberate self-focus of egotistic individuals.
Struggle with Social Judgment: Research suggests people with egocentric tendencies might define traits and abilities in ways that are centered around their own perspective, even when well aware of different criteria.
Self-Perception and Interpersonal Dynamics
Individuals’ perception of their self-worth is intimately connected to their need for validation from others. When people feel validated, their self-concept is often strengthened, which can influence interactions in a social context.
However, a constant need for external validation may lead to egocentric behavior, where individuals view interactions predominantly through their own perspective; this is detailed in the Egocentric Tactician Model of Constantine Sedikides, Mark Alicke, and John Skowronski. In contrast, a strong, secure sense of self-worth may lessen the need for seeking approval, promoting more balanced relationships.
In Relationships
In personal relationships, egotism and egocentrism can sever the bonds of trust and collaboration that are essential for a healthy partnership. An egotistical individual, often consumed by self-importance, may struggle to validate their partner’s feelings, leading to a breakdown in communication. This behavior can manifest as an overemphasis on one’s own achievements, disregarding the efforts and successes of the partner.
On the other hand, egocentrism — seeing situations predominantly from one’s own perspective — can be inadvertently hurtful, as egocentric people may overlook the needs and desires of the other. Resentment can build in relationships where one party feels consistently overlooked or undervalued, which over time can erode the foundation of mutual respect and understanding that is key to lasting relationships.
In the Workplace
In a professional setting, both egotism and egocentrism can hinder the collaborative spirit necessary for a team’s success. An egotistical employee or leader may place personal ambitions above collective goals, affecting team trust and morale. Their inability to collaborate can result in a lack of communication, where team input is undervalued or ignored, stifling innovation and progress.
Egocentric individuals might not intentionally sabotage team efforts but may still contribute to a dysfunctional team dynamic. Their focus on their viewpoint can cause miscommunications and frustration among colleagues. For example, they might monopolize discussions or become defensive when presented with alternative perspectives, leading to conflicts and inefficiencies within teams.
Psychological Perspectives on Egoism
Cognitive theories suggest that egocentrism is the result of certain cognitive biases present within an individual’s thought process. It manifests when a person is unable to differentiate between their own perspective and that of others, leading to a self-focused approach to interpreting events and information.
David Elkind’s research elaborates on this concept, indicating that egocentrism can lead to the belief of an imaginary audience, where individuals think that others are as concerned with their thoughts and actions as they are themselves.
Elkind also coined other terminology to explain the egocentric tendencies of adolescents, such as the personal fable and the invincibility fable. When an egocentric adolescent experiences an imaginary audience, they usually believe that there is an audience that is enthralled and always present, to the point of being unduly interested in the egocentric individual.
Personal fable refers to the notion that many youths believe their thoughts, feelings, and experiences are unique and more intense than anybody else’s. In the invincibility fable, the adolescent feels that he or she is immune to misfortune and cannot be affected by anything that a normal person would face.
Piaget’s Theory
Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist renowned for his work on child development, postulated that egocentrism is most prevalent during the preoperational stage of cognitive development. This stage typically occurs between the ages of 2 and 7, where children exhibit a natural tendency towards egocentric thinking.
As they progress into adolescence and reach the formal operational stage, their cognitive structures become more sophisticated, and they gain the ability to consider multiple perspectives, gradually overcoming egocentrism.
Piaget was interested in two aspects of egocentricity in children: language and morality. He argued that egocentric children used language largely to communicate with themselves. Piaget discovered that children talked to themselves while playing, and this egocentric speech was just the child’s thoughts. He considered that this speech served no special purpose other than to accompany and reinforce the child’s current activities.
He hypothesized that as the child matured cognitively and socially, the amount of egocentric speech employed would decrease. Psychologist Lev Vygotsky, on the other hand, believed that egocentric speech is more meaningful since it permits the kid to progress in social speech and mental development. In addition to Piaget’s thesis, he felt that while talking with others, the youngster assumes that others know everything about the subject under discussion and becomes dissatisfied when asked for further information.
Piaget conducted a test to evaluate egocentrism known as the Mountains Study. He placed youngsters in front of a basic plaster mountain range and asked them to choose from four images the view that he, Piaget, would perceive. Before the age of seven, the younger children chose the picture of the view they saw for themselves, demonstrating a lack of ability to appreciate a viewpoint other than their own. In other words, their way of thinking was egotistical.
Only when children reached the concrete-operational stage of development, between the ages of seven and twelve, did they become less egocentric and capable of appreciating perspectives different from their own. In other words, they have the ability to consider cognitive perspectives. However, the mountains test has been criticized for focusing solely on the child’s visuo-spatial awareness rather than egocentrism.
A follow-up study using police dolls demonstrated that even young children could accurately describe what the interviewer would perceive. It is believed that Piaget overstated the extent of egocentrism in children. Egocentrism is thus the child’s incapacity to see other people’s points of view, and should not be mistaken with selfishness. At this stage of cognitive development, the youngster assumes that their worldview is consistent with that of others.
Other research have concluded that egocentrism does not manifest itself in the same patterns as previously identified. More recent research has indicated that egocentrism is prominent in later stages of development, contrary to Piaget’s original findings, which claimed that egocentrism is only present in early childhood development.
Cultural and Social Influences
Cultural and social milieus profoundly shape the development of egocentric and egotistical attitudes. Social media platforms have significantly altered the landscape of self-expression and affirmation.
The immediate feedback loop provided by likes, shares, and comments can lead to an overemphasis on self in the digital space, reinforcing egocentric behaviors. They also offer a stage for individuals to present an idealized version of themselves, potentially leading to egotistical tendencies when one’s self-worth becomes too closely tied to online recognition.
Impact of Culture on Self
Cultural values and norms inform the extent to which egocentric or egotistical attributes are deemed acceptable or are encouraged. In individualistic cultures, there might be a greater focus on personal achievement and autonomy, potentially nurturing an egotistical self-view.
Conversely, in collectivist cultures, the community and relationships take precedence, which can sometimes mitigate against egocentrism and instead promote behaviors that consider others’ perspectives and needs.
Common Misconceptions
What is ego, anyway? Should you get rid of it completely? Some believe so.
The notion of “ego death” emerged from various interconnected schools of thought, particularly the following: Jungian psychology, Joseph Campbell’s comparative mythology, anthropological studies of shamanism and rites of passage, Theosophy, and the psychedelic movement of the 1960s and 1970s.
Here we take a more traditional stance and describe ego as a neutral notion that represents one of many elements of ourselves. The ego in this view is simply one’s individuality, the thoughts, behaviours and experiences that make a person unique. It is the component that senses reality and makes sense of everything around us, which makes it indispensable.
In distinguishing between egotism and egocentrism, a common pitfall is confusing self-assurance with arrogance and natural developmental behaviors with selfishness. Clarifying these differences is crucial to understanding the nuances of human behavior.
Egotism versus Confidence
Egotism is often mistaken for confidence; however, the two are distinct. Confidence is characterized by a positive self-regard that is based in reality and accompanied by humility. It does not overstep into the belief that one is superior.
On the other hand, Egotism involves an excessive and unfounded sense of self-importance, often leading to arrogance and a lack of consideration for others.
Egocentrism and Developmental Stages
Egocentrism is not solely indicative of egotistical behavior but, as noted above, is a normal part of childhood development. During the early stages of life, children exhibit egocentric behavior as they are not yet capable of fully understanding perspectives outside of their own.
In adolescence, this can continue to manifest, but it gradually diminishes as the individual develops the capacity for empathy and recognizes other viewpoints. It’s important to distinguish this developmental egocentrism, which decreases with age and growth, from consistent egotistical behavior, which is marked by persistent self-centeredness and disregard for others’ feelings or thoughts.
References:
- Dunning, D., & Cohen, G. L. (1992). Egocentric definitions of traits and abilities in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 341–355.
- Elkind, David (1967). Egocentrism in Adolescence. Child Development. 38 (4): 1025–1034. doi: 10.2307/1127100
- Epley, Nicholas; Morewedge, Carey K; Keysar, Boaz (2004-11-01). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 40 (6): 760–768. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.002
- Frankenberger K. D. (2000). Adolescent egocentrism: A comparison among adolescents and adults. Journal of Adolescence. 23 (3): 343–354. doi:10.1006/jado.2000.0319
- Grayling, Anthony Clifford (2009). Ideas that Matter. London: Orion. ISBN 978-0297856764
- Junefelt, K (2007). Rethinking egocentric speech: towards a new hypothesis. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
- Karniol, R. (2003). Egocentrism versus protocentrism: The status of self in social prediction. Psychological Review, 110(3), 564–580.
- Kowalski, R. M. (Ed.). (1997). Aversive interpersonal behaviors. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Myers, David G. (2008). Psychology. New York: Worth. ISBN 978-1-4292-2863-3
- Nour, M.; Evans, L.; Nutt, D.; Carhart-Harris, R. (2016), Ego-Dissolution and Psychedelics: Validation of the Ego-Dissolution Inventory (EDI), Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10: 269, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00269
- Pronin, E.; Olivola, C. Y. (2006). Egocentrism. In N. J. Salkind (ed.). Encyclopedia of Human Development. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Reference.
- Samuel D. Schmalhausen, (1928) Why We Misbehave. Garden City Publishing Co., Inc., Garden City, New York, 1928
- Sedikides, Constantine, Mark D. Alicke, and John J. Skowronski. On the utility of the self in social perception: An Egocentric Tactician Model. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 63, Academic Press, 2021.
- Vartanian LR (Winter 2000). Revisiting the imaginary audience and personal fable constructs of adolescent egocentrism: a conceptual review. Adolescence. 35 (140): 639–661
Image credit: Clementina Hawarden 1861–62