Cognitive restructuring involves identifying and challenging irrational or maladaptive thoughts. The process is therapeutic and analytical, requiring individuals to examine the evidence for and against their thoughts, question their validity, and then replace them with more balanced and realistic ones. For example, cognitive restructuring is a key element within traditional cognitive-behavioral therapy that helps to modify the beliefs underlying distressing thoughts.
Cognitive reframing , on the other hand, can refer to almost any conscious shift in a person’s mental perspective. Another key distinction between cognitive reframing and cognitive restructuring is awareness.
Cognitive reframing can occur unconsciously, whereas cognitive restructuring, which is typically done under the supervision of a therapist, is conscious and deliberate. Reframing thoughts, however, is also a cognitive tool used in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as a form of cognitive restructuring, blurring the distinction further.
For example, when someone exhibits hindsight bias, they are unconsciously changing their frame of reference in order to maintain pride and self-esteem. Although the need to negatively reframe thoughts is not as common as the need to positively reframe them, there are times when it is beneficial to negatively reframe thoughts.
Cognitive Restructuring
Cognitive restructuring (CR) is a core component of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), aimed at identifying and altering negative thoughts that contribute to emotional distress and maladaptive behaviors. It’s a tool used in therapy to tackle cognitive distortions and reshape them into more adaptive and realistic thought patterns.
It is useful in the psychotherapeutic process of learning to identify and challenge irrational or maladaptive thoughts known as cognitive distortions, such as all-or-nothing thinking (splitting), magical thinking, overgeneralization, magnification, and emotional reasoning, which are commonly associated with many mental health disorders.
CR employs a variety of strategies, including Socratic questioning, thought recording, and guided imagery, and it is used in a variety of therapies, aside from CBT, such as rational emotive behavior therapy.
There are four steps to CR:
- Identification of problematic cognitions known as “automatic thoughts” (ATs) which are dysfunctional or negative views of the self, world, or future based upon already existing beliefs about oneself, the world, or the future
- Identifying cognitive distortions in the ATs
- Rational dispute of ATs with the Socratic method
- Building a rational counter-argument to the automatic thoughts
There are six kinds of automatic thoughts: thoughts about the evaluations of others, self-evaluated thoughts, thoughts of avoidance, evaluative thoughts about the other person with whom one is interacting, thoughts of avoidance, thoughts about coping strategies and behavioral plans, and other thoughts that were not categorized.
Therapy Techniques
During the process of cognitive restructuring, therapists employ various techniques to aid individuals in identifying their negative thought patterns. These techniques may include:
Thought records: Individuals keep a diary of negative thoughts they experience, the situation in which they occurred, the emotions they felt, and the resulting behavior.
Socratic questioning: Through guided questioning, therapists encourage individuals to explore the validity of their negative thoughts and find logical alternatives.
Behavioral experiments: Therapists help clients test the accuracy of their negative beliefs by designing experiments to confront these thoughts in real life.
Decastrophizing, also known as decatastrophization: a cognitive restructuring technique used to treat cognitive distortions like magnification and catastrophizing, which are common in psychological disorders like anxiety and psychosis.
Cognitive restructuring is not about simply replacing negative thoughts with positive ones; it’s about finding a truthful middle ground. In cognitive therapy, which is an integral part of CBT, this is accomplished by working with a therapist to assess the evidence for and against certain beliefs and to develop a more balanced thought pattern.
Role of Socratic Questioning
Socratic questioning is a method used to challenge cognitive distortions by asking a series of guided questions. This approach encourages individuals to question their irrational thoughts and consider other possibilities leading to more rational and adaptive thinking. Key Socratic questions include:
- What evidence supports this thought?
- Could there be another explanation?
- What is the effect of thinking this way?
By using Socratic questioning, one can dismantle irrational thoughts and cognitive distortions, such as all-or-nothing thinking or overgeneralization, with a logical and evidence-based approach. This process is instrumental in learning to think in a more balanced and less distorted way.
Types of Cognitive Distortions
Cognitive distortions come in various forms, each of which can skew perception and thinking. The following are a few key types:
- All-or-Nothing Thinking: Viewing situations in only two categories instead of on a continuum.
- Overgeneralization: Taking a single event and generalizing it to an overall pattern.
- Catastrophizing: Expecting the worst-case scenario to happen without considering more likely outcomes.
- Magnification: Exaggerating the importance of problems or shortcomings.
Each type of distortion impacts one’s mental framework, leading to a more negative outlook on life and a distortion of reality.
Strategies for Thought Pattern Transformation
Transforming thought patterns, particularly negative ones, involves a conscious effort to recognize, challenge, and alter them towards more balanced and positive thinking. This process can be crucial in various forms of behavioral therapy and aims to equip individuals with effective coping strategies.
Self-Monitoring and Thought Records
A fundamental step in addressing negative thought patterns is through self-monitoring, where individuals track their thoughts and identify triggers. They then use thought records, structured tools to document these thoughts and the situations that elicit them.
The practice generally involves recording the date and situation, detailing the automatic thought, assessing the emotion attached, and noting the intensity of the feeling. This technique promotes awareness of one’s own cognitive processes, laying the groundwork for identifying patterns that may lead to distress or unhelpful behaviors.
- Situation: Note the context or event. (Example – forgot a co-worker’s name during a meeting)
- Automatic Thought: Write down the exact thought. (“I’m such an idiot. So incompetent.”)
- Emotion: Identify the emotion you feel. (Embarrasment)
- Intensity: Rate the intensity of the emotion on a scale. (4 out of ten)
- Alternative Thought and Positive Self-Talk (“I was only introduced to her once, and I’m under a lot of stress. I’m only human.”)
Once individuals become adept at recognizing their negative thought patterns through self-monitoring and thought records, they can begin to cultivate alternative thought and positive self-talk. This entails generating more accurate and less distressing thoughts and using them to counter the negative ones.
Techniques include problem-solving, where individuals address the issue prompting the negative thoughts with practical solutions, and behavioral therapy techniques such as role-playing to practice alternative responses to similar situations. Positive self-talk is instrumental in this process, as it encourages a shift towards affirmations and constructive, supportive language directed towards oneself.
Challenge the Thought: Ask whether the thought is based on facts or assumptions.
Construct Alternative: Create a balanced thought that reflects the situation more accurately.
Positive Affirmations: Regularly use supportive and empowering self-language.
Cognitive Reframing
Aaron T. Beck pioneered cognitive therapy in the 1960s. Working with patients diagnosed with depression, he discovered that negative thoughts persisted in their minds. Beck assisted his patients in recognizing the influence of their negative thoughts and transforming their perspective to a more positive one.
This finally resulted in the patients’ depression being reduced, if not eliminated altogether. Albert Ellis used the phrase “cognitive restructuring” to describe the process of reconsidering perceived negative beliefs and transforming them into positive thoughts. Using cognitive restructuring as a tool in therapeutic settings led other researchers to discover that this process occurs outside of the clinic, prompting them to coin the phrase “cognitive reframing” to characterize the more general process.
Cognitive reframing can be effective in a variety of situations, including improving memory, reducing exam anxiety, and assisting parents and children in dealing with disabilities. People with memory problems, for example, were informed that changing their perspective on their situation would help them remember better. Their memory improved after the treatment.
Humor, particularly positive humor, has been demonstrated to facilitate cognitive reframing. For example, in one study, participants were shown a sequence of unpleasant images. To deal with these images, participants were asked to make a positive joke about the photo, a bad or demeaning joke about the picture, or no joke at all.
The positive jokes tended to provoke pleasant feelings better than negative jokes. The authors found that positive comedy exemplifies a type of cognitive reframing in which people adjust their viewpoint from an undesirable occurrence or condition to a more positive outlook on the same situation.
Though the need to negatively reframe thoughts is not as often as the need to positively reframe them, there are times when it is useful to negatively reinterpret them. In theatre, for example, an actor may be required to appear sadder or more depressed.
To achieve this, he or she may use cognitive reframing to change his or her state of thought in order to appear more dysphoric on the outside. Another application of cognitive reframing is when one attempts to make one’s opinions objective, which involves adjusting your perspective to be impartial and less polarized regarding a given circumstance.
References:
- Beck, A (1997). The past and the future of cognitive therapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 6, 276-284
- Ellis, A., & Grieger, R. (1977). Handbook of rational emotive therapy. New York: Springer
- Hope D.A.; Burns J.A.; Hyes S.A.; Herbert J.D.; Warner M.D. (2010). Automatic thoughts and cognitive restructuring in cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy Research. 34: 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10608-007-9147-9
- Lachman, M.E., Weaver, S.L., Bandura, M., Elliot, E. & Candlewick, C.J. (1992). Improving memory and control beliefs through cognitive restructuring and self-generated strategies. Journal of Gerontology, 47, P293-P299
- Robson Jr, James P; Troutman-Jordan, Meredith (2014). A Concept Analysis of Cognitive Reframing. Journal of Theory Construction and Testing. 18 (2)
- Ryan C. Martin; Eric R. Dahlen (2005). Cognitive emotion regulation in the prediction of depression, anxiety, stress, and anger. Personality and Individual Differences. 39 (November 2005): 1249–1260. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.004
- Samson, Andrea C.; Gross, James J. (February 2012). Humour as emotion regulation: The differential consequences of negative versus positive humour. Cognition & Emotion. 26 (2): 375–384. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.585069
- Taylor S.; Woody S.; Koch W.J.; McLean P.; Paterson R.J.; Anderson K.W. (1997). Cognitive restructuring in the treatment of social phobia. Behavior Modification. 21 (4): 487–511. doi: 10.1177/01454455970214006
- Vernooij‐Dassen M, Draskovic I, McCleery J, Downs M. Cognitive reframing for carers of people with dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD005318. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005318.pub2