Openness to Experience Personality Trait

Published
Openness to Experience

Openness to Experience is a personality trait that sits within the Big Five or Five-Factor Model of personality, which also includes traits such as conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. This trait characterizes the breadth, depth, and complexity of an individual’s mental and experiential life.

People with high levels of Openness to Experience often display a preference for exploring their inner and outer worlds. They are typically described as having broad interests, and they approach problems and situations with originality. Those scoring lower on this trait might be more traditional and may prefer familiarity over novelty.

Research exploring these personality traits suggests a link between Openness to Experience and various life outcomes including creativity, job performance, and the propensity for leadership

Openness involves:

  • A propensity for novelty and variety
  • Appreciation for art, emotion, adventure, and unusual ideas
  • Intellectual curiosity and creative imagination

Specific facets of this trait may include:

  • Aesthetic Sensitivity: Recognizing art and beauty
  • Inquisitive: Pursuing interests and seeking out new experiences
  • Creative Imagination: Valuing unusual ideas and playing with concepts
  • Intellectual Engagement: Engaging with abstract and critical thinking
  • Tolerant of Diversity: Embracing various cultural and intellectual worlds

Biological and Developmental Factors

Research has identified specific genetic components that have a significant role in an individual’s openness to new experiences. Studies illustrate that particular gene variants, especially those related to the neurotransmitter dopamine, can be linked to higher levels of Openness.

For example, a variation in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) has been associated with novelty-seeking behavior, which is a component of Openness to Experience. Individuals with certain DRD4 genotypes may exhibit a greater motivation to engage in new experiences and intellectual pursuits.

In addition to genetic factors, brain structure also correlates with Openness to Experience. The efficiency of the brain’s default network (DN), which is involved in daydreaming, imagination, and future planning, has been found to be higher in individuals scoring high in Openness. This suggests a biological basis for the trait, as brain network efficiency could facilitate the cognitive processes that enable one to be open and receptive to novel stimuli and ideas.

Aging and Openness Dynamics

Openness to Experience is not static throughout life and can be influenced by the process of aging. Contrary to the common assumption that people become less open as they age, some individuals maintain or even increase their levels of Openness over time.

This dynamic can be connected to both biological and psychological factors, such as changes in cognitive functioning and life experiences that promote personal growth. Knowledge and intelligence, for instance, can continue to develop with age, contributing to an individual’s willingness to explore new ideas.

Moreover, as people age, they generally become more conscientious and agreeable, while levels of neuroticism and extraversion may decline. These shifts in personality traits can impact the expression of Openness, potentially moderating or amplifying it, depending on the interaction of these factors with each individual’s unique life circumstances.

Psychological Dimensions and Facets

Openness to experience may consist of both motivational and structural components. People with a high level of openness are eager to seek new experiences and participate in self-examination.

They have a fluid type of consciousness, which helps them to generate innovative linkages between seemingly unrelated ideas. Closed people, on the other hand, want familiar and customary experiences.

Intellect and Creativity

Openness to experience is associated with creativity, as measured by divergent thinking tests. Openness has been connected to creative and scientific inventiveness, with professional artists, musicians, and scientists scoring better in openness than the general population.

Openness to experience is associated with intellect, with correlation coefficients ranging from approximately r=.30 to r=.45. These relationships differ greatly depending on which aspect of intelligence is investigated. Meta-analyses, for example, have revealed relationships ranging from .08 with processing speed abilities to .29 with linguistic abilities.

Several studies have discovered positive correlations between openness to experience and general knowledge, particularly verbal knowledge. People with a high level of openness may be more inclined to engage in intellectual activities that expand their knowledge.

Openness to experience, particularly the Ideas component, is associated with the need for cognition, a motivating propensity to think about ideas, study information, and enjoy solving puzzles, as well as regular intellectual involvement.

Emotion and Adventurousness

The dimension of emotion and adventurousness encapsulates the willingness to explore physical, emotional, and intellectual boundaries. This is evident in their active imagination and openness to new experiences, which includes the readiness to engage in new adventures or explore unfamiliar cultures.

Emotionally open individuals are also often more aware of their own feelings, leading to a capacity for experiencing emotions in a nuanced and complex way.

Social Attitudes

People who are open to experience are more likely to be liberal and accept variety. As a result, they are more open to other cultures and lifestyles.

They exhibit less ethnocentrism, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Openness has a greater (negative) connection with right-wing authoritarianism than the other five-factor model features.

Openness has a somewhat smaller (negative) relationship with social dominance orientation than weak agreeableness (the other qualities have negligible relationships). Openness has a greater negative connection with prejudice than the other five-factor model features.

Relationships

When it comes to personal relationships, openness to experience promotes a broad-minded approach toward partnership and sexual satisfaction. Highly open individuals are more likely to support non-traditional relationships and display a wider range of sexual interests.

Their propensity for novelty extends into their intimate lives, where they might exhibit a non-conventional understanding of sexual satisfaction that emphasizes emotional connectivity and mutual exploration. This motivational quest for rich and varied experiences often fosters a deeper appreciation for unique perspectives within interpersonal connections.

Openness in Daily Life

Individuals scoring high in openness to experience often immerse themselves within a variety of cultural contexts. They typically possess an intrinsic appreciation for art and aesthetics, fostering a vibrant engagement with music, visual arts, and performing arts.

This reflects in the frequency of their visits to galleries, concerts, and theaters, where they derive deep personal meaning and satisfaction from such experiences.

For these individuals, engaging with art and culture isn’t just a pastime but a key aspect of their identity. They often keep abreast of contemporary and classical cultural forms and may actively create new experiences that challenge their existing perspectives.

When it comes to routines and lifestyle, those who are open to experience display a pronounced flexibility. They often deviate from the norm, embracing less structured and more unconventional lifestyles. Their routines are typically interspersed with varied activities, suggesting a comfort with the unexpected and new experiences. They might:

  • Experiment with diverse cuisines
  • Travel frequently and spontaneously
  • Pick up new hobbies regularly
  • Engage in thoughtful conversation with a wide array of people

This not only leads to a dynamic way of life but also encourages continuous personal growth. Such individuals tend to be liberal in their approach, valuing diversity in their daily interactions and environments.

Openness to Experience and Mental Health

Openness to experience often correlates with a greater appreciation for a variety of experiences, which can lead to increased levels of happiness and well-being. Those with high openness may have an enhanced ability to adapt to change and a willingness to engage with novel and complex stimuli.

These traits may contribute to a richer, more fulfilling life experience. Conversely, there is evidence that anxiety symptoms might be less prevalent among individuals who score high in openness, implying a potentially protective role against certain types of anxiety disorders.

Individuals with schizotypal personality disorder (odd and fragmented thinking), narcissistic personality disorder (excessive self-valuation), and paranoid personality disorder (sensitive to external hostility) all exhibit high levels of openness. Lack of understanding (poor openness) is common to all personality disorders and may explain the continuation of maladaptive behavioral patterns.

Other problems associated with low openness include difficulty adapting to change, low tolerance for diverse worldviews or lifestyles, emotional flatness, alexithymia, and a limited variety of interests. Rigidity is the most visible manifestation of low openness in personality disorders; it demonstrates a lack of understanding of one’s emotional experiences.

Comparison with Other Traits

Openness to experience and conscientiousness are often seen as two ends of a spectrum concerning the organization and imagination. While individuals high in openness are usually curious, inventive, and open to new ideas, those high in conscientiousness tend to be more disciplined, efficient, and prefer a planned rather than spontaneous approach.

One pivotal study found a clear hierarchical relation between these traits, indicating unique domains of individual differences without one being superior to the other.

On the other hand, openness and neuroticism differ markedly in their emotional dimensions. Individuals with high openness may be more prone to engage with a broad range of emotions and seek out novel experiences, whether they lead to pleasant or unpleasant feelings. Conversely, those high in neuroticism generally exhibit emotional instability and a tendency towards anxiety and moodiness, which can limit their willingness to explore unfamiliar or challenging experiences.

References:
  1. Beaty, R. E., Kaufman, S. B., Benedek, M., Jung, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Jauk, E., … & Silvia, P. J. (2016) Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency. Human brain mapping, 37(2), 773-779.
  2. DeYoung, Colin G.; Peterson, Jordan B.; Higgins, Daniel M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality. 73 (4): 825–858. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x
  3. Fleischhauer, Monica; Enge, Sören; Brocke, Burkhard; Ullrich, Johannes; Strobel, Alexander; Strobel, Anja (2010). Same or Different? Clarifying the Relationship of Need for Cognition to Personality and Intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36 (1): 82–96. doi:10.1177/0146167209351886
  4. Jang, K. L.; Livesly, W. J.; Vemon, P.A. (1996). Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. Journal of Personality. 64 (3): 577–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00522.x
  5. McCrae, R. R.; John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality. 60 (2): 175–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
  6. McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin. 120 (3): 323–337. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.323
  7. McRae, Tobert R. (2004). Openness to Experience. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. Vol. 2. Elsevier
  8. Moutafi, Joanna; Furnham, Adrian; Crump, John (2006). What facets of openness and conscientiousness predict fluid intelligence score?. Learning and Individual Differences. 16: 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.003
  9. Piedmont, Ralph L.; Sherman, Martin F.; Sherman, Nancy C. (December 2012). Maladaptively high and low openness: the case for experiential permeability. Journal of Personality. 80 (6): 1641–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00777.x