Birth Order in Adlerian Psychology

Published
Birth Order in Adlerian Psychology

One of the first theorists to propose that birth order influences personality was Alfred Adler (1870–1937), an Austrian psychiatrist who was a contemporary of Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung. He maintained that an individual’s manner of life, which is their habitual approach to the responsibilities of work, love, and friendship, can be permanently influenced by their birth order.

Adler enjoyed surprising lecture audiences and dinner guests by correctly guessing people’s birth order based on their behavior. He discussed four situations: the first-born child, the second-born child, the youngest child, and the sole child.

Adler’s birth order theory posits that firstborns often exhibit leadership qualities and perfectionism. Middle children tend to be diplomatic and sociable. Youngest children may be outgoing and creative.

Only children frequently display characteristics similar to firstborns. Birth order can influence feelings of inferiority and how individuals strive for significance.

The theory emphasizes that birth order is not deterministic. Other factors like family dynamics, parenting styles, and individual experiences also play crucial roles in shaping personality.

Research has explored connections between birth order, intelligence, and personality traits. Some studies suggest firstborns may have slightly higher IQs, though results are mixed.

Personality traits associated with birth order include:

  • Firstborns: Responsible, ambitious, conscientious
  • Middle children: Adaptable, diplomatic, peacemakers
  • Youngest: Charming, risk-taking, attention-seeking

Various studies have attempted to operationalize Adlerian theory through empirical research on actual birth order. Findings indicate birth order may influence social interest and coping strategies.

It is crucial to recognize the distinction between ordinal and psychological birth order. For instance, in certain families, a second child may exhibit behaviors similar to those of a firstborn, in which case they are classified as an ordinal secondborn but a psychological firstborn.

The First-born Experience

Adler, the second of six children, believed that the firstborn child would be in a favorable position, enjoying the full attention of the eager new parents until the arrival of a second child.

First-born children typically exhibit high levels of achievement and responsibility. They often strive for perfection and seek approval from authority figures. Only children share many traits with firstborns, as both occupy similar family positions.

These children tend to be:

  • Conscientious
  • Organized
  • Reliable
  • Ambitious

First-born and only children have been shown to demonstrate higher internal locus of control. This means they believe they have significant influence over their lives and outcomes.

Leadership and Responsibility among Oldest Siblings

Oldest siblings often take on leadership roles within their families. They may act as surrogate parents to younger siblings, especially in times of parental absence.

This early experience with responsibility can translate to:

  • Strong leadership skills in adulthood
  • Comfort with authority positions
  • A sense of duty and obligation

Firstborn children frequently excel in academic and professional settings. Their drive for achievement, combined with early leadership experiences, often leads to success in competitive environments.

However, this role can also create pressure. Oldest siblings may feel burdened by expectations and struggle with perfectionism. Balancing these responsibilities with personal needs is a key challenge for many first-born individuals.

Middle Child Personality and Dynamics

Middle children occupy a unique position in family dynamics, which shapes their personality and behaviors. According to Adler, firstborns are “dethroned” when a second child comes along, and this loss of perceived privilege and primacy may have a lasting influence on them.

Middle-born children face challenges in carving out their identity within the family structure. They often compete with both younger and older siblings for attention and resources. This position can foster adaptability and diplomacy skills.

Middle children frequently develop strong negotiation abilities. They learn to mediate conflicts between siblings and find compromises. These skills often translate into adulthood, making them effective team players in professional settings.

Many middle children become adept at forming alliances. They may align with older or younger siblings situationally, enhancing their social flexibility. This adaptability can lead to success in diverse social and professional environments.

Middle Child Syndrome and Coping Strategies

Middle child syndrome refers to feelings of neglect or invisibility that some middle-born children experience. These feelings can stem from perceived lack of attention compared to firstborns and youngest siblings.

Common coping strategies include:

  • Developing unique talents or interests
  • Seeking attention through achievements
  • Forming strong friendships outside the family

Middle children often excel in cooperation and peacemaking. They may compensate for feelings of neglect by becoming highly empathetic and skilled at reading social cues.

Some middle children adopt a rebellious stance to stand out. Others may become more independent, relying less on parental approval and developing strong self-reliance.

A study was conducted in 1988 by Dr. Linda Silverman to investigate the disparities in the perceived IQ of middle-born children and their siblings. Researchers discovered that parents generally held a more favorable opinion of their first-born’s intelligence than they did of their junior siblings based on the data they had gathered.

The IQ scores of siblings of similar ages were typically within a few points of one another when testing their IQ. The research determined that, despite the fact that siblings exhibited a similar IQ as a result of their shared environment, the manner in which they were treated based on their perceived intellect was discordant.

Youngest Child

The youngest child in a family often exhibits distinct behavioral patterns and personality traits. These characteristics shape their interactions and development in unique ways.

Adler suggested that the later characteristics of younger and only children may be influenced by the pampered and spoiled treatment they tend to receive. This all presupposes what Adler considered to be a typical family situation, such as a nuclear family that resides independently of the extended family, has no orphaned children, has an average spacing between births, does not have twins or other multiples, and has surviving children who do not have severe physical, intellectual, or psychiatric disabilities.

Youngest children tend to be sociable and outgoing. They often develop strong people skills and charm, which help them navigate social situations with ease.

These siblings may seek attention more frequently than their older counterparts. This behavior stems from a desire to stand out in the family dynamic. Youngest children often display a carefree attitude and may take more risks. They typically receive less pressure from parents, allowing for a more relaxed upbringing.

Youngest siblings might struggle with responsibility or decision-making. This can result from older family members often making choices for them during childhood.

Last-born children frequently exhibit high levels of creativity. They often think outside the box and approach problems with innovative solutions.

Independence is a key trait in youngest children. They learn to assert themselves early to establish their place in the family structure. These siblings may pursue unconventional career paths or hobbies. Their creative mindset and desire for individuality drive them to explore unique interests.

Last-borns often show resilience and adaptability. These traits develop as they navigate their position in the family and seek to differentiate themselves from older siblings.

Only Children

Only children often develop a strong sense of individuality. They receive undivided parental attention, which can foster high self-esteem and confidence. This intense focus can lead to accelerated maturity and advanced verbal skills.

Without siblings, only children may develop a heightened sense of responsibility. They often become more self-reliant and independent at an earlier age compared to children with siblings.

The absence of sibling rivalry can reduce stress, but it may also limit opportunities for developing conflict resolution skills. Only children might struggle with sharing or compromising in social situations.

Sociability and Self-Esteem in Singletons

Contrary to stereotypes, many only children develop strong social connections. They often seek out peer relationships to compensate for the lack of siblings, potentially becoming adept at forming friendships.

Only children may exhibit higher self-esteem due to concentrated parental investment. This can translate into academic and professional ambition, with a pronounced striving for superiority in various aspects of life.

Some only children may face challenges in group settings, as they are accustomed to one-on-one interactions. This can initially impact their comfort in larger social environments, but many adapt successfully over time.

Adlerian Therapy and Counseling

Adlerian therapists use birth order analysis to understand clients’ personality development and relational dynamics. They explore how a person’s position in the family has shaped their beliefs and behaviors.

Therapists help clients recognize and challenge faulty assumptions stemming from their birth order. For example, firstborns might struggle with perfectionism, while youngest children may feel inadequate.

Interventions often involve reframing negative self-perceptions and encouraging clients to develop their unique strengths. Therapists guide individuals to set realistic goals and overcome feelings of inferiority through positive action.

Role-playing exercises can be used to practice new behaviors and communication styles within the family context. This helps clients break free from restrictive birth order roles and develop more adaptive patterns.

Adlerian family counselling emphasizes understanding family dynamics and improving relationships. Therapists use techniques like family constellation mapping to visualize and discuss roles and interactions.

The “catch them being good” technique encourages parents to focus on positive behaviors, reinforcing cooperation and self-esteem in children. This helps counteract negative patterns that may arise from birth order positions.

Mutual respect and democratic decision-making are key principles in Adlerian family counselling. Therapists guide families to establish family councils where all members have a voice in solving problems and setting goals.

Encouragement is a central Adlerian technique. Therapists teach family members to offer genuine praise and support, fostering a sense of belonging and significance for each individual regardless of birth order.

References:
  1. Adler, A. (1922). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York: Harper & Row & London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  2. Adler, A. (1924). The practice and theory of individual psychology (2nd ed. rev.). Humanities Press
  3. Adler, A. (1964) Problems of neurosis. New York: Harper & Row
  4. Adler, A. (1964). The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler. H. L. Ansbacher and R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.). New York: Harper Torchbooks. ISBN 0-06-131154-5
  5. Eckstein, Daniel & Aycock, Kristen & Sperber, Mark & McDonald, John & Wiesner, Victor & Watts, Richard & Ginsburg, Phil. (2010). A Review of 200 Birth-Order Studies: Lifestyle Characteristics. Journal of individual psychology. 66. 408-434
  6. Griffith, Jane (2007). The lexicon of Adlerian psychology: 106 terms associated with the individual psychology of Alfred Adler. Robert L. Powers, Jane Griffith (2nd ed., rev. and expanded ed.) Adlerian Psychology Association, Ltd., Publishers. ISBN 978-0-918287-10-6. OCLC 180773812
  7. Lacson, Jefferson & Lementillo, Dale & Ramoso, Nicole & Saavedra, Jhon. (2023). A Comparative Study of Birth Order and Their Feelings of Inferiority and Superiority Chapter 1. 10.13140/RG.2.2.16848.07688.
  8. Largado, Alicia & Gonzales, Patricia & Bautista, Geline & Gabriel, Bryan. (2024). Implications of Birth Order on Personality and Social Behavior. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 4. 127-143. 10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i03.012.
  9. Sarbin, T.R. & Allen, V.L. (1968). Role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol.1). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley
  10. Sliverman, Linda Kreger (1988) The Second Child Syndrome. Mensa Bulletin. pp. 1–3
  11. Stewart, A. E. (2012). Issues in birth order research methodology: Perspectives form individual psychology. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(1), 75–106
  12. Sultan, H., & Malik, S. (2020). Adler birth order predicts personality characteristics in young adults. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 10-18