Genetics, Early Environment Strongly Influence Gut Microbiome

Published

Birthplace and genetics both have a big impact on the make-up of the microbial community in the gut, suggests research from scientists at the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

The work is an attempt to unravel the forces that shape the gut microbiome, which plays an important role in keeping us healthy. PNNL’s Janet Jansson, a corresponding author of the study, said:

“We are starting to tease out the importance of different variables, like diet, genetics and the environment, on microbes in the gut. It turns out that early life history and genetics both play a role.”

The study linked specific genes in mice to the presence and abundance of specific microbes in its gut.

Similar To Human Genes

Scientists studied more than 50,000 genetic variations in mice and ultimately identified more than 100 snippets that affect the population of microbes in the gut. Some of those genes in mice are very similar to human genes that are involved in the development of diseases like arthritis, colon cancer, Crohn’s disease, celiac disease and diabetes.

The abundance of one microbe in particular, a probiotic strain of Lactobacillales, was affected by several host genes and was linked to higher levels of important immune cells known as T-helper cells. These results support the key role of the microbiome in the body’s immune response, and suggest the possibility that controlling the microbes in the gut could influence the immune system and disease vulnerability.

First author Antoine Snijders of the Berkeley Lab, said:

“We know the microbiome likely plays an important role in fighting infections. We found that the level of T-helper cells in the blood of mice is well explained by the level of Lactobacillales in the gut. It’s the same family of bacteria found in yogurt and very often used as a probiotic.”

Clear Microbial Signature

To do the research, the team drew upon a genetically diverse set of “collaborative cross” mice that capture the genetic variation in human populations.

Scientists studied 30 strains of the mice, which were housed in two facilities with different environments for the first four weeks of their lives. The scientists took fecal samples from the mice to characterize their gut microbiomes before transferring them to a third facility.

The researchers found that the microbiome retained a clear microbial signature formed where the mice were first raised – effectively their “hometown.” Moreover, that microbial trait carried over to the next generation, surprising the scientists.

“The early life environment is very important for the formation of an individual’s microbiome. The first dose of microbes one gets comes from the mom, and that remains a strong influence for a lifetime and even beyond,”

said Jian-Hua Mao, a corresponding author from Berkeley Lab.

In brief, the team found that:

  • Both genetics and early environment play a strong role in determining an organism’s microbiome
  • The genes in mice that were correlated to microbes in the gut are very similar to genes that are involved in many diseases in people

The researchers also found indications that moderate shifts in diet play a role in determining exactly what functions the microbes carry out in the gut.

“Our findings could have some exciting implications for people’s health,” said Jansson. “In the future, perhaps people could have designer diets, optimized according to their genes and their microbiome, to digest foods more effectively or to modulate their susceptibility to disease.”

Reference:
  1. Antoine M. Snijders, Sasha A. Langley, Young-Mo Kim, Colin J. Brislawn, Cecilia Noecker, Erika M. Zink, Sarah J. Fansler, Cameron P. Casey, Darla R. Miller, Yurong Huang, Gary H. Karpen, Susan E. Celniker, James B. Brown, Elhanan Borenstein, Janet K. Jansson, Thomas O. Metz, Jian-Hua Mao. Influence of early life exposure, host genetics and diet on the mouse gut microbiome and metabolome. Nature Microbiology, Nov. 28, 2016, dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.221

Last Updated on November 18, 2023